Developed a Go-to-Market plan for a ground breaking product 

Through qualitative research, the team and I prototyped three concepts, tested the experience touchpoints to validate the desirability, and co-created a development roadmap to launch a new payment model.

Client

MSD Animal health (via frog)

Year

Jan 2023 - May 2023

Role

Strategy, research, service design, prototyping

Impact

I built collaborative and trust based relationship with the client. This translated into project continuation and new project sales. 

The chosen business model will allow MSD to tap into $200million business opportunity.

Challenge

Convince the leadership that newly developed business model can bring value to veterinarians, pet owners and the organisation

Outcome

GTM plan for the validated Pay-per-Use business model. 

Part 1

Framing the approach

The context

MSD has developed a ground-breaking product. It is an injectable product that protects dogs from fleas and ticks for 12 months. 

In the US on average dogs are given anti-parasite treatments to protect them for 6-9 months per year, because pet owners forget or don't want to repeatedly apply antiparasitic medication despite vet's recommendation to protect dogs for 12 months. 

currentsith
A common story in pet owner's life

Why the traditional pay-per-product business model is a "no-go"

Early research indicated that most vets would prescribe the product only for small dogs. 

The dose depends on the dog’s size so one vial of the injectable can service ~ 7 dogs. The bigger the dog, the more product will be needed - the higher the price.

Price per vial is $1200 so for a large dog the treatment may cost ~$650 depending on vet's margin. Most vets admitted they wouldn't even dare to offer the treatment for such price. 

‎M2.‎001
Traditional business model makes the product profitable to vets only when prescribed to small  dogs 

The ask

My colleague and I were asked to figure out the business model for the product. When we started talking to stakeholders we realised that there were gaps:

  • Everyone had different explanations to team's ideas for business models
  • Many saw different problems
  • Many thought they know their vets well, and other audiences are irrelevant.
  • People didn’t know what it means to work collaboratively in agile

We spoke to internal MSD stakeholders, couple of vets, vet office administrators and pet owners to get a better understanding about the current situation and initial reactions to the new product. 

‎frog-x-Philips-DMEC-Innovation-Accelerator-v0.02.‎001
Screenshot-2024-01-23-at-13.00.07
cards
Interviews with pet owners frogs from the USA
Card sorting excersise

Redefined the problem

During the interviews it became clear to us that the product introduction in itself is not a problem. Issues arise with the fact that new injectable will cause more training and work for clinic staff as well as to the vets who are already very busy.

The updated challenge: design a business model that can reduce the impact on cashflow for vets and incentivise vets to treat large dogs too.

Screenshot-2023-03-02-at-11.47.08
Screenshot-2023-03-02-at-11.47.21
Current persona journeys

The “aha-moment” for the client

Initially the client was only focusing on pricing strategy for different business models. During the alignment workshop, I facilitated the co-creation of the new decision-making criteria which helped them broaden the focus from pricing to strategic, business, and technical fit of each idea.

These questions helped the team see that next to pricing and other business areas, pet owners are a critical part of the process and must be considered during solution development.

Screenshot-2023-02-22-at-12.59.16
"Likely" "Unlikely" - this allowed the team to quickly assign the most suitable response to critical questions in the uncertain situation

Decision to test 2 ways for pet owners to pay

The team was very interested to test the two innovative concepts - "pay-per-use" and "pet owners pay directly to MSD". It has been decided to split the latter concept in two to test pet owner's preference for convenience to pay before or after the treatment.

Part 2

Testing the concepts and planning

Setting up the way of working

Agreed on timelines for the next phase, sprint length (2 weeks) and established RACI for 20+ team members. 

Defined the core team of six people, coached them on the new process and innovation mindset. Most importantly we asked them to commit at least one hour per week for the collaborative work. Little by little we kept involving them more and in the end we collaborated almost daily.

Screenshot-2024-01-23-at-13.27.56
Storyboardng workshop setup 
Pay-per-use-IDEA-2
Direct-to-PO-extreme-option-IDEA-3
Direct-to-PO-team-option-IDEA-3
Final storyboards for the concepts

Co-creation workshops led to refined concepts

Storyboarding workshops helped to extract the knoweldge and mental models from the experts and stakeholders on how each model could potentially work step by step. 

Frog team afterwards consollidated the input and turned concepts into prototypes for testing. I worked closely with the interaction designer to create six user flows - two for every concept to test vet's and pet owner's experiences. 

Concept-C-flow
Concept C pet owner's flow
Screenshot-2024-01-23-at-14.24.13
Concept A. Pay-per-use model when pet owner pays to a clinic
Screenshot-2024-01-23-at-14.24.25
Concept B. Pet owner pays to MSD after the treatment
Screenshot-2024-01-23-at-14.24.35
Concept C - Burner brand. Pet owner pays before the treatment directly to MSD

Insights from qualitative interviews

Interviews with pet owners and vets were led by frog team while stakeholders connected to listen and ask questions in the background. 

The results were processed in a couple of stages: recording main takeaways from each interview, finding common themes and deriving insights, enriching client's personas with behavioural aspects and placing them on axis in order to reflect their main behaviour drivers.

Screenshot-2024-01-23-at-14.39.39
Immediately after the interview, process and discuss the main takeaways in a structured way.
Screenshot-2024-01-23-at-14.49.25
We showed the process to the client, derived insights together and placed vets in corresponding behavioural archetypes axises

2-day in person workshop to decide the winning concept and define next steps

Interview insights readout led to the conclusion that "Concept A. Pay-per-use" will be introduced first; and "Concept C. Pet owner pays before the treatment to MSD" will be introduced later to administer repeated treatments. 

During the sessions 2 Service Blueprints and 1 GTM Roadmap were filled in. Together we defined project's vision and next steps going forward for the next phase. 

Screenshot-2024-01-23-at-14.55.54
Stakeholders did a "museum walk" to read through the OnePagers from every interview, participated in discussions and collaboration sessions
Screenshot-2024-01-23-at-15.51.36
Pre-filled the happy path of the blueprint, then had the client fill the rest!

Main deliverables

Merck_Service-blueprint_Pay-per-use_Revised
Final Service Blueprint for Pay-per-Use model
Merck_Roadmap_Revised
GTM roadmap to show to the leadership that all aspects of the plan development were considered
Merck_TechnologyEcosystem
Tech ecosystem map shows Concept A data flow that is aligned with the third-party software representative

Conclusion & Next steps

Leadership of the client was convinced to go with the innovative solution

At the same time when we wrapped up our research, quantitative market research results came in from the client side. It confirmed our recommendation and showed that veterinarians see great value in Pay-per-Use business model. 

These results helped to build the business case that going to market with 2 business models is a $200 million dollar opportunity in the next 5 years!

 

Screenshot-2024-01-23-at-15.56.53
The solution adheres to the Ethical aspect because it gives access to the ground-breaking treatment to all dogs sizes

The 3rd phase of the Concept A development is in the progress of collecting approvals from the client leadership. The product is still waiting for the FDA approval too.  

Feedback from the team

“Vaiva helped organize and evolve client perspectives to help get them to not only agree on an approach but see the value in partnering with frog.

Vaiva is an incredible strategic partner and helps solve the unsolvable. She's collaborative but also stands up for her perspective."

matt

Matt Resnick

Head of Brand Strategy @frog

“You handled the client communication and promoted collaboration with them very well. Your efforts have not only strengthened our client relationships but have also significantly contributed to the overall success of our projects. I look forward to working on more projects together.”

fei

Fei Liao

Sr. Interaction Designer @frog

Team operations

Team setup

Part 1

1 Strategy Designer (me)

1 Strategic consultant

4 Stakeholders from the client side

Part 2

1 Strategic designer (me)

1 Interaction designer

1 Design Associate director (part time)

1 Consumer Engagement Director (part time)

2 Third-party experts

9 Stakeholders (4 in the core team)

Methods and practises

Qualitative interviews

Design studios

Design reviews

Wireframing

Prototyping

User journey mapping

Behavioural archetypes

UX/UI design

Service design

Strategy

Workshop design and facilitation

Tool

Figma

Miro

Qualstage

Vaiva Rivas © 2024